Antivirus Test Results 2009 Hyundai

Hyundai Genesis 2009 models mfg. 2008 FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Acceptable Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Good Acceptable Good Good Poor Acceptable Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Add relevant social results and recommendations from your friends and contacts, to your regular search results. What your friends share matters Wajam.com.

Test details: The Hyundai Genesis was introduced in the 2009 model year. Two tests of the Genesis were conducted. In the first test, the dummy's head hit the steering wheel through the airbag, producing a high head acceleration. Also, forces on the dummy's right lower leg, knee, and foot indicated that injuries would be likely to the leg and possible to the knee and foot. In response, Hyundai modified the airbag and added padding behind the knee bolster in the area of the push-button ignition switch. In the second test, the right leg/foot injury rating improved to Good. Most injury data from the head were not obtained, but after the Institute reviewed comparable test data from Hyundai, the head/neck injury risk was rated Good in the second test.

The airbag and knee bolster modifications apply to all 2009 and later models manufactured after November 2008 (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). The cars manufactured before and after being modified are rated separately, except that the structural ratings for both vehicles are based on both Institute tests. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was reasonably well controlled.

During rebound, the dummy's head moved partway out the open side window and hit the roof rail and B-pillar. Injury measures — Measures taken from the neck and chest indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions in a crash of this severity. A high head acceleration occurred when the dummy's head hit the steering wheel through the airbag, indicating that head injuries would be possible. Forces on the right tibia, knee, and foot indicate that injuries would be likely to the lower leg and possible to the knee and foot.

Head accelerations from the roof rail and B-pillar hits were low. Hyundai Genesis 2009 models mfg. 2008 2009 Top Safety Pick 2009 Hyundai Genesis: good performance in front, side, and rear tests and standard electronic stability control FRONTAL OFFSET TEST OVERALL EVALUATION: Good Structure/safety cage Injury measures Restraints/dummy kinematics Head/neck Chest Leg/foot, left Leg/foot, right Good Good Good Good Good Good Important: Frontal crash test ratings can be compared only among vehicles of similar weight.

Test details: The Hyundai Genesis was introduced in the 2009 model year. Two tests of the Genesis were conducted. In the first test, the dummy's head hit the steering wheel through the airbag, producing a high head acceleration.

Also, forces on the dummy's right lower leg, knee, and foot indicated that injuries would be likely to the leg and possible to the knee and foot. In response, Hyundai modified the airbag and added padding behind the knee bolster in the area of the push-button ignition switch. In the second test, the right leg/foot injury rating improved to Good.

Most injury data from the head were not obtained, but after the Institute reviewed comparable test data from Hyundai, the head/neck injury risk was rated Good in the second test. The airbag and knee bolster modifications apply to all 2009 and later models manufactured after November 2008 (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door).

The cars manufactured before and after being modified are rated separately, except that the structural ratings for both vehicles are based on both Institute tests. Restraints/dummy kinematics — Dummy movement was well controlled. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the roof rail. Injury measures — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. (Note: during the test, most injury data from the head were not obtained, but after the Institute reviewed comparable head and neck test data from Hyundai, the head/neck injury risk was rated good.).

Your kidding right? You must have got the 2-year, because the 1 (2-year is $114), and the. But then again you're in Australia, maybe it just costs more there?

That is way too expensive considering Norton 360 provides mediocre protection-It didnt do to well in recent antivirus/antimalware testing (alot of false positives, and poor hueristic detection of new and emerging threats). Dont get me wrong though, Norton is an excellent product with an excellent detection rate of 'known' malware and viruses, but there are better, and cheaper ones out there. Check out the Vista SP1 Antivirus performance lab test results below. You would be better off using something like (19,50/39,95 Euro), or (on par with Avira Pro/Premium which is the best on the market). Smart Security is $59, but I just use NOD32 4 Antivirus/Antimalware ($39), and my annual renewal is $27 - with free product upgrades when new versions are released.

Coupled with UAC, Windows firewall and Windows Defender you are about as well protected as you would be with a full Security Suite. Good Luck on your Norton 360- I would contact them regarding your validation issue ASAP.

G Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. The Hyundai Tucson was redesigned for the 2016 model year, and the Kia Sportage was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Structure The driver space was maintained well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 15 cm at the parking brake pedal and no more than 7 cm at other lower interior locations. Upper interior intrusion measured 4-5 cm at the upper hinge pillar and instrument panel. Injury measures Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Restraints and dummy kinematics The dummy’s movement was well controlled.

The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed and has sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed. Tested vehicle specifications Tested vehicle 2016 Hyundai Tucson SE 4-door 4wd Weight 3,451 lbs. Side airbags front and rear head curtain airbags and front-seat mounted torso airbags Wheelbase 105 in.

Length 176 in. Engine 2.0 L 4-cylinder EPA ratings 21 mpg city / 26 mpg highway. G Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. The Hyundai Tucson was redesigned for the 2016 model year, and the Kia Sportage was redesigned for the 2017 model year.

Structure The passenger space was maintained reasonably well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 19 cm at the lower hinge pillar. The door sill was pushed in laterally 12 cm toward the passenger dummy. Maximum upper interior intrusion measured 10-11 cm at the dashboard and hinge pillar. Passenger injury measures Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Passenger restraints and dummy kinematics The dummy’s movement was well controlled.

The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. The side curtain airbag deployed and has sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The side torso airbag also deployed. Driver injury measures Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Driver restraints and dummy kinematics The dummy’s movement was well controlled. The dummy’s head loaded the frontal airbag, which stayed in front of the dummy until rebound. Tested vehicle specifications Tested vehicle 2016 Hyundai Tucson SE 4-door 4wd Weight 3,446 lbs.

Side airbags front and rear head curtain airbags and front-seat mounted torso airbags Wheelbase 105 in. Length 176 in. Engine 2.0 L 4-cylinder EPA ratings 21 mpg city / 26 mpg highway.

G Important: Frontal crash test ratings should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight. The Hyundai Tucson was redesigned for the 2016 model year, and the Kia Sportage was redesigned for the 2017 model year. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2016 Tucson conducted by Hyundai as part of. Injury measures Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Restraints and dummy kinematics Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side curtain and side torso airbags deployed during the crash.

After the dummy moved forward into the frontal airbag, it rebounded into the seat without its head coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury. Tested vehicle specifications Tested vehicle 2016 Hyundai Tucson SE 4-door 4wd Weight 3,461 lbs. Side airbags front and rear head curtain airbags and front-seat mounted torso airbags Wheelbase 105 in. Length 176 in. Engine 2.0 L 4-cylinder EPA ratings 21 mpg city / 26 mpg highway. G Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle categories. The Hyundai Tucson was redesigned for the 2016 model year, and the Kia Sportage was redesigned for the 2017 model year (the two vehicles are now built on the same platform).

Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test of a 2016 Tucson conducted by Hyundai as part of. Grundig Sonoclock 410 Manual Arts. Injury measures Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Passenger — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

Head protection Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof. Passenger — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof. Tested vehicle specifications Tested vehicle 2016 Hyundai Tucson Limited 4-door 4wd Weight 3,505 lbs.

Side airbags standard front and rear head curtain airbags and standard front-seat mounted torso airbags Wheelbase 105 in. Length 176 in. Engine 1.6 L turbocharged 4-cylinder EPA ratings 24 mpg city / 28 mpg highway.

Test ID VTS1505 B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm) Negative numbers indicate the amount by which the crush stopped short of the seat centerline. In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength. A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches.

For an acceptable rating, the minimum required strength-to-weight ratio is 3.25. For a marginal rating, it is 2.5.

Anything lower than that is poor.